Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Hate Never Cures Hate

Kerry Dalton, Victoria Thorpe, Raymond Reyes 9/11/2016






The conversation rises and falls in our country; 
why the death penalty?
 In a nation which claims to be advanced, the world leader, where human rights are why we go to war (wow, that sounded contradictory.), we remain one of the few nations to retain such a barbaric practice. This practice continues to align the U.S.A. with countries whose politics and philosophies we judge harshly for their lack of human rights.

The United States is in company with North Korea, China, Yemen and Iran, as the top countries for executing their own citizens.

The United Nations has declared the death penalty to be inhumane.

In Nebraska this Fall they will be voting on this subject, their legislature outlawed the death penalty last year, however some Nebraskans, like attorney Bob Evnen, decided it was worth the cost to try to reinstate state sanctioned killings. California will also have the death penalty on their ballots; both the opportunity to end the wasteful system and the option to speed up the process (CA has not executed any one since 2005, an elderly Native American. Nebraska hasn’t used it’s killing machine in 20 years.)
A recent article on Nebraska’s choice interviewed Mr. Evnen, leading the fight to keep the death penalty. He looks to the Bible first, “… you'll find capital punishment is prescribed for certain crimes. And so we begin with capital punishment is morally required.” Evnen was referring to The books of Moses. (1)

 Mr. Evnen has left out some vital details.

In his Bible, death was also a remedy for infidelity, magic, cursing God’s name, violating the Sabbath, and even disrespecting your parents.
Does he want us to follow those directions too?

The following conditions are a few of the requirement before imposing a death sentence  found within the Talmud, which is the Jewish instruction to accompany the Torah, or what Evnen and Christians refer to as the Bible, the Old Testament in particular:

*The person accused must have been warned just prior to their actions, and acknowledge they understood.

*There must be at least two eye-witnesses, who both testify to the same story exactly, and they cannot be interviewed together or hear the other’s story. They also must be warned they will be the ones to receive the death penalty if they lie. There could be no benefit to either eye-witness for their testimony or in the sentencing of the accused.

*A court of at least 23 judges were required to agree. (3)

Another point Mr. Evnen states, “…law enforcement overwhelmingly supports the death penalty. That it is something that helps protect them…” including that “… it's reserved for the most heinous crimes and the most vicious criminals.”
Neither of these statements are true. Statistics from the FBI have proven the death penalty is not a deterrent (2), and how do we explain Gary Ridgeway living in Walla Walla Prison (convicted of killing  48  women) while Cal Brown was executed in 2010 (convicted of killing one).

“…At some point I think justice requires that the person that did that horrendous act pay the ultimate price,” Evnen said.
This touches on the most important point in this whole issue; humanity. When we kill people under the guise of “justice”, doing-to-them-what-they-did-to-us, we lose our own humanity. We become the perpetrator. There is no way around it. No matter how you dress it up it is killing when killing is not the only option, and not the best option for humanity.

First we play God and take away their humanity, then we throw away our own by jumping into the killing machine. There is such a tragic cost, and I don’t just mean money!

There are deep tragedies we cannot explain or fix, and some lives will never be the same. I ask us to think about avoiding more suffering, to seek ways of healing and the communal good. More killing never builds a strong close community. As Martin Luther King Junior said, only love outshines hate.

Let us chose mercy and compassion.


End the death penalty.

References:

(1) http://netnebraska.org/article/news/1038169/campaigns-intensifying-against-death-penalty-nebraska
Campaigns Intensifying For, Against The Death Penalty In Nebraska
by Mike Tobias, Senior Producer/Reporter, NET News    August 24, 2016

(2) Death Penalty Information Center
(3) Rabbi Michael Goldstein



Raymond Reyes, Kerry Dalton, Victoria Thorpe 9/10/2016

Saturday, July 23, 2016

What a fantastic day visiting with Kerry Lyn!

Victoria, Kerry, Carla, Adam, and Toni
Dear friends visit her for the first time, July 23rd, 2016
Carla and Toni come from Brazil and Spain. We all drove 1,169 miles over the last 2 days just to spend time with Kerry this weekend. We all love her and believe in her innocence. We all work towards her exoneration and bringing her home.


Toni, Adam, Carla, Kerry, and Victoria





Monday, June 6, 2016

Vacation with Kerry Lyn, June 4th and 5th.






It gets more difficult each time we leave without her. 21 years this weekend she has endured on Death row. She is innocent--could that be why she has never had her automatic appeal reviewed? Still waiting...

Saturday, March 12, 2016

Kerry Lyn Dalton Continues to Wait for Her First Appeal after 21 years

Kerry Lyn in the middle, her sister Victoria to the right, Raymond to the left. March 7, 2016

 Victoria, Kerry Lyn, Raymond. March 6,2016


This was the 21 year mark for when Kerry was sentenced to death for a crime that has never even been proven to happened. She still waits for her 1st State level appeal.
She is innocent.
We need people to care about this huge injustice. Raymond and I spent the two visiting sessions available over the weekend with Kerry, we love her company!
 Please take time to look through this blog for details on her innocence, wrongful conviction, and the process she has been stuck in for over 21 years

 
 Peace to your day.



156 people have been exonerated from death rows in the U.S.A. - mistakes do happen! Purposeful actions to gain a conviction happen also.
These 156 are the lucky ones to have their convictions overturned - some have been executed before the truth came out (these innocents spent many many years stuck in a system that doesn't work ; most 15 plus years, many 18 - 30 years even!)
A few have even had a second or third trial convict them again before finally receiving relief and freedom. This shows how difficult it can be to get the truth to prevail after a conviction.
 
I continue to challenge the public to think rationally: Kerry's case should never even have gone to trial: 

NO body,
NO blood,
NO weapon,
NO forensics at all,
NO crime scene...

Consider the facts, look into the case and FACTS.
A lot of false information was spread, a trial of hearsay evidence, snitches gaining favors, and false reports of confessions given to the press by law enforcement is all this case was built on. Every law enforcement who testified at the trial admitted there was absolutely no physical evidence of a murder - or even any other crime.
The alleged victim was NOT EVEN DECLARED DECEASED during Kerry Lyn's trial - nearly 6 1/2 years after the alleged incident.  

We have no forensics to test, or to examine. But, we have an abundance of facts of perjury, favors given, recanted testimony, and more. Our system promises an appeal - yet Kerry Lyn has never even had her first level appeal reviewed. 


Give Kerry her day in court, we ask the CA Supreme Court to review her appeal which has been waiting, fully briefed, since 2009. 


Look through this blog for more information, trial transcripts, and submit questions. 
Thank you.

Link to list of exonerated: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/innocence-list-those-freed-death-row

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Kerry Lyn Dalton Case has Similarities -



Prosecutor who sent innocent man to death row                     is disbarred   (from Chron/Houston Chronicle) Updated 9:03 am, Tuesday, February 9, 2016


"AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A former prosecutor who used false testimony and withheld evidence to send a now-exonerated man to Texas' death row has lost an appeal to overturn his disbarment."

When Kerry Lyn's case finally is reviewed (still at its first level after over 20 years...) we may see these same results.
The prosecutor was aware of the numerous discrepancies and Brady violations in her case. The prosecutor used witnesses he knew perjured themselves, exculpatory evidences were not only kept out of the trial but were not turned over to the defense.

All this added to a case WITHOUT any physical evidence:
No body
No blood
No weapon
No crime scene
No forensics at all
There should never have been a trial - could this be WHY her case is not getting reviewed? There are so many issues with her case it must be addressed and cannot simply be stamped and denied. If it was as cut-and-dried as prosecutor Dusek claimed, it would have passed on long ago. Give Kerry Lyn her day in court; ask the appellate court to read her appeal and rule on it. 



Read full article on death row exoneree Anthony Graves here:
http://www.chron.com/news/article/Disbarment-of-Texas-prosecutor-of-ex-death-row-6817491.php

Friday, December 25, 2015

Kerry Lyn Dalton: why we work to exonerate her


It's a blessing to be with Kerry on Christmas Day. 
We pray for peace and joy to the women on the Row in Chowchilla. 
We pray for love and blessings to touch all who are condemned here in the U.S.A., and for comfort and strength to their loved ones.

Updated 01/23/16
For those who don't have time to read through the abundant information and facts on this blog :  
We believe in Kerry Lyn's INNOCENCE. Ms. May was never even proven deceased. There is absolutely NO physical evidence that Ms. May was killed , was harmed, or there was any crime against her associated with Kerry and the other 3 co-defendants. To this day there are no forensics to evaluate, no forensics to prove - or disprove the case. No body, no blood, no weapon(s), no crime scene. Only a missing person's report filed at the request of the prosecutor's team. Ms. May was not declared deceased even DURING THE TRIAL.
So how can any one "re-create" the "crime scene" or act out the alleged murder without any forensics? How could that scene in the series be true and leave no evidence behind?
When you watch the Deadly Women episode you are watching the prosecutor and lead investigator's "story". If you were to read the trial you would learn it is NOT the same story they passed along to the show's writers. Even then, how can their version leave behind no evidence? Wouldn't the expert law enforcement investigators out-smart a bunch of meth addicts? (It is a fact that everyone involved at the trailer scene was an addict.) 
The case began July 1988, when Ms. May allegedly went missing; the record shows only law enforcement thought she was missing when they requested a CPS worker to call in a missing person report. So it is untrue when Dusek says Ms. Baker came to them.   
All claims that Kerry confessed were entered into court by way of hearsay; someone saying someone else told them something. NEVER did Kerry Lyn confess to anyone, at any time, check the records. 
That show is meant to inflame the viewers, it sensationalizes serious life occurrences for entertainment - fear driven entertainment. Mr, Dusek and Mr. Cooksey outright lied in that video for Deadly Women, I was at the trial, I know the case, I have the transcripts and the discovery.
Kerry Lyn's appeal has been held up for over 20 years - her 1st level appeal has not been judged yet - why? Because they do not want the truth to come out. 
That is why I have this blog, that is why I will not quit until Kerry is exonerated. I have the facts in my possession, I work to share them for Kerry's sake and for the many, many others who need our system fixed. 
What would you do if you KNEW your loved one was innocent on Death Row? I hope you would fight for their freedom. 
*Look through this blog for much more info and facts*

Sunday, December 20, 2015

Trial Testimony from Sheriff Wilson

Re-posted from 2011:

The following are excerpts from Sheriff Wilson’s Testimony,
he was at the residence the night of the alleged murder scene, June 26th, 1988,
that Dusek & Cooksey described in the Deadly Women show, in reference to the Dalton case;

(p. 2738 line 12-14)THE CLERK:  PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL NAME FOR THE
RECORD AND SPELL YOUR LAST.
THE WITNESS:     DAVID WILSON, W-I-L-S-O-N.
(p.2741,line 2-4)  
Q.
(prosecutor Dusek) OKAY. GOING BACK TO JUNE 2 6TH,
1988, DID YOU RECEIVE A CALL LEADING YOU TO A TRAILER PARK?
A. YES, I DID.
Q. ABOUT WHAT TIME DID YOU GET THE CALL, DEPUTY?
A. I COULD LOOK AT MY LOG AND GIVE YOU THE EXACT
TIME.
Q. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT.
A. I HAVE A COPY OF IT. WELL IT IS A COPY. I CAN'T
EVEN READ IT. I BELIEVE THAT IT IS 2055 IS WHEN I
ACTUALLY RECEIVED THE TELEPHONE CALL AT MY RESIDENCE.
Q. THOSE OF US NOT IN THE MILITARY OR LAW
ENFORCEMENT, WHAT TIME IS THAT?
A. THAT WOULD BE 8:55 IN THE EVENING.

(p.2724 line 7-16)Q. WHERE DID YOU GO?
A. SPACE NUMBER 25,IN THE LIVE OAK SPRINGS TRAILER
PARK.
Q. ALL RIGHT.CAN YOU DESCRIBE THAT AREA FOR US, WHERE
THE TRAILER PARK WAS?
A. THE TRAILER PARK IS — IS IN A — WHAT USED TO BE -
IT WAS AN OLD RETIREMENT AREA, SMALL LIKE A LITTLE
VILLAGE, THEN THEY ADDED THE TRAILER PARK TO IT SO
THERE IS A LOT OF SMALL,  OLDER HOMES THERE WITH A
SMALL TRAILER PARK, APPROXIMATELY — APPROXIMATELY —
PROBABLY ABOUT 30 TRAILERS.
(p. 2745 line 28, 2746 1-10)Q. ALL RIGHT. HOW LONG DID IT TAKE YOU TO GET TO the
TRAILER, APPROXIMATELY?
A. LET'S SEE, I ARRIVED THERE AT 2102 SO IT WOULD
HAVE BEEN 7 MINUTES.
Q. DID YOU GO WITH ANYONE?
A. NO.
Q. WHAT TYPE OF VEHICLE?
A. I BELIEVE AT THAT TIME IT WAS A FOUR-WHEEL DRIVE
CHEVY BLAZER. I BELIEVE THAT WE HAD CHEVIES THEN.
Q. MARKED UNIT?
A. YES, IT WAS MARKED.
(p. 2747 21-27,p. 2748 16)Q. DID YOU SPEAK WITH MISS FEDOR?
A. YES, I DID.
Q. DESCRIBE HER CONDITION?
A. SHE APPEARED TO BE ON METHAMPHETAMINE. SHE WAS
VERY EXCITED, VERY — SHE WOULDN'T COMPLETE HER
SENTENCES. SHE WOULD START HER SENTENCE THEN RESTART
ANOTHER ONE. SHE WAS VERY PARANOID ACTING.
A. I HAVE ARRESTED OTHER PEOPLE FOR BEING UNDER THE
INFLUENCE OF METHAMPHETAMINE AND OTHER DRUGS.     
I HAD ALSO INTERVIEWED HER IN THE PAST.
I HAVE HAD CONTACT WITH HER.
(p.2751 line 22-28, 2752 1-23, Q. WHAT WAS THE ORIGIN OF THE CALL, DO YOU RECALL?
A. IT WAS TO TAKE A REPORT OF A BURGLARY.
Q. WHILE YOU WERE THERE, DID SHE REFER TO ANY OTHER
ITEMS OF EVIDENCE OR INTERESTS THAT YOU RECALL?
A. YES,SHE SAID THAT — WHEN I ASKED HER WHAT HAD
BEEN TAKEN FROM THE HOUSE,  SHE SAID A TRASH CAN HAD
BEEN TAKEN,  YELLOW TRASH CAN AND
A SLIPCOVER FOR A CHAIR.
Q. DID SHE TALK ABOUT ANY OTHER PIECES OF EVIDENCE
THERE THAT SHE WAS CONCERNED WITH?
A. YES, SHE DID.SHE SAID THAT THERE — SHE HAD
FOUND A BLOOD SOAKED PILLOW CASE ON HER BED.
Q. DID YOU TRY TO FIND THAT?
A. YES, I DID.
Q. WHAT WAS THE RESULT, WHAT HAPPENED?
A. I WAS UNABLE TO FIND IT.
Q. WHAT DID YOU DO, WHERE DID YOU LOOK?
A. I LOOKED — SHE SAID THAT IT HAD BEEN ON HER BED.
I LOOKED ON HER BED, IT WASN'T THERE. THEN SHE SAID
THAT THEY PUT IT IN A BOX, IT WAS UNDER THE TRAILER.
I LOOKED UNDERNEATH THE TRAILER. THERE WAS NO BOXES OR
PILLOW CASE.
Q. DID YOU ACTUALLY GO UNDER THE TRAILER?
A. I KNELT DOWN AT THE TRAILER, WAS ABLE TO LOOK
UNDERNEATH ASSISTED BY MY FLASHLIGHT.
Q. HOW LONG WAS THIS TRAILER?
A.I BELIEVE THAT IT IS 60 FEET, I BELIEVE.
Q. AND WHAT LOCATION DID YOU POSITION YOURSELF WHEN YOU
LOOKED UNDER THE TRAILER?
A. ABOUT FIVE DIFFERENT POSITIONS.
Q. YOU COULDN'T FIND ANYTHING THERE?
A. NO.
(2753 11-16)Q. YOU WROTE HER OFF AS A CRAZY DOPER?
A.YES,I DID.
Q.HOW LONG DID YOU REMAIN AT MISS FEDOR'S RESIDENCE?
A.I BELIEVE THAT I WAS THERE FOR ABOUT 18 MINUTES.
Q. DO YOU HAVE A LOG THAT SHOWS THAT?
A. YES, I DO. I ARRIVED AT 2102 AND I LEFT AT 2120
(p.2766 line 18-28, 2767 1-6)Q.(cross examination defense attorney Landon) AND WHEN
YOU CAME INTO THE KITCHEN, DID YOU SEE ANY BLOOD?
A. NO, I DIDN’T.
Q. WHEN YOU WENT INTO THE LIVING ROOM, DID YOU SEE ANY
BLOOD?
A. NO,I DID NOT.
Q. AND WHEN YOU CAME INTO THE MASTER BEDROOM, DID YOU
SEE ANY BLOOD?
A. NO, I DID NOT.
Q. DID JOANNE FEDOR, THIS INDIVIDUAL YOU HAD CONTACT
WITH, POINT OUT TO YOU ANY BLOOD IN THE TRAILER?
A. NO, SHE DID NOT.
Q. IF YOU HAD SEEN BLOOD IN THE TRAILER,WOULD YOU
HAVE MADE A NOTE OF THAT?
A. YES, I WOULD HAVE.
Q. WOULD THAT HAVE CONCERNED YOU?
A. YES,IT WOULD HAVE.
(p. 2768 line 9-27)Q. DID YOU — YOU HAD SOME COMMENT MADE BY JOANNE
FEDOR ABOUT HER FINDING A BLOOD-SOAKED PILLOWCASE;
IS THAT CORRECT?
A. YES.
Q. AND SHE INDICATED THAT SHE HAD — HAD FOUND IT ON
HER BED?
A. THAT'S CORRECT.
Q. AND DID YOU GO TO THE BED TO TAKE A LOOK TO SEE
WHETHER OR NOT YOU COULD FIND A BLOOD-SOAKED PILLOWCASE?
A. YES, I DID.
Q. AND DID YOU FIND ONE?
A. NO.
Q. AND DID YOU FIND ANY TRACE OF ANY BLOOD ON THE BED?
A. NO, I DIDN'T.
Q. DID YOU LOOK?
A. YES.
Q. ONCE AGAIN USING YOUR FLASHLIGHT TO INSURE YOU HAD
ENOUGH LIGHT TO LOOK;IS THAT CORRECT?
A. THAT'S CORRECT.
(p. 2770 line 10-19)Q. YOU INDICATED THAT YOU HAD HAD CONTACT WITH
MISS FEDOR' IN THE PAST; IS THAT RIGHT?
A. YES,I HAD.
Q. AND IN YOUR CONTACT WITH HER IN THE PAST, HAD YOU
NOTICED HER TO BE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF DRUGS?
A. YES, I HAD.
Q. AND TO YOU, THEN, SHE WAS A KNOWN METH USER;
IS THAT CORRECT?
A. YES, SHE WAS.
Q. DID YOU FIND ANY EVIDENCE THAT SUPPORTED A
BURGLARY COMPLAINT WHEN YOU WENT TO JOANNE FEDOR'S
TRAILER THAT NIGHT ON JUNE 26TH, 1988?
A. NO,I DID NOT.



Kerry Lyn Dalton was wrongfully convicted: based on the testimony of a co-defendant & disreputable hearsay, there is no physical evidence and no common sense evidence. Please look further at this blog for more information.
There is no justice or closure in false convictions.


Deputy Wilson’s testimony covers 42 pages,
if you are interested in his entire testimony
please leave me your email and I will send it
to you, I will not publish your email.
This case ended with NO BODY - NO WEAPON - NO BLOOD; the evidence table was empty- There were NO FORENSICS evidence to support the drug induced stories even though
the elite task force conducted 3 searches.
Please ask me questions you may have about the case- I will answer them all,
I want everyone to know the truth.


http://www.safecalifornia.org/home


**Refer to the Nov 21, 2011, article (No Victim Established Day 6 of the Trial), to locate
case #, Judge and attorney names.
Looking through older posts will give you much more background and information. Please keep asking me questions.